Santini-Burton Modernization Act

If approved by Congress, the Santini-Burton Modernization Act will update a decades-old federal law so that funds originally dedicated to Lake Tahoe can support both land acquisition and long-term stewardship, at no cost to taxpayers. The bill was introduced in January, 2026 by a bi-partisan delegation.

Sections of the Upper Truckee River in South Lake Tahoe, CA, were acquired through the Santini-Burton Act.
Photo by: TRPA

The Original Santini-Burton Act of 1980

In the mid-20th century, Lake Tahoe was at risk of overdevelopment. Fragmented planning and rapid subdivision pushed homes, roads, and commercial development into sensitive wetlands and meadows, damaging the fragile ecosystem that supports the lake’s famed clarity. Environmentally focused land use planning was not introduced until the creation of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) in 1969.

The federal Santini-Burton Act of 1980 further protected sensitive lands and helped curb overdevelopment through federal land acquisitions. Representatives Jim Santini of Nevada and Phil Burton of California co-sponsored the legislation directing the USDA Forest Service (USFS) to begin acquiring sensitive land around the Lake Tahoe Basin using proceeds from the sale of federal land in the Las Vegas area.

Since Congress passed the Santini-Burton Act, the USFS has acquired more than 16,000 acres in the Tahoe Basin. Properties acquired are typically in wetlands or stream environment zones or on steep slopes prone to erosion. These protected urban lots not only safeguard Tahoe’s water quality from runoff and other impacts from residential development, they also reduce visual impacts of urbanization, provide buffers between developed urban lots, reduce noise, and benefit wildlife.

Santini-Burton lands include popular recreation and conservation areas such as the Upper Truckee River, multiple entryways to the iconic Tahoe Rim Trail, sections of Tahoe’s East Shore, Blackwood Canyon on the West Shore, and thousands of neighborhood parcels throughout the basin that maintain open space and protect habitat.

Today, nearly 90 percent of the Tahoe Basin is under public protection.

As a leader of the Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program (EIP)—a partnership known as Team Tahoe—TRPA and many partners, including the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, have been working for years on legislation to modernize the Santini-Burton Act.

Why Modernization Matters Now

While the Santini-Burton Act was transformative, changes in the 2000s inadvertently limited the law’s scope so funds could only be used to acquire land, but not to manage it. Today, Tahoe’s most urgent needs have moved beyond acquisition and focus on stewardship of public lands. The Santini-Burton Modernization Act of 2026 was introduced as a bicameral and bipartisan bill on January 27, led in the Senate by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and in the House by Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.).

If enacted, modernization would unlock funds for ongoing management, allowing Team Tahoe partners to complete more lake-saving EIP projects that protect Lake Tahoe’s clarity, improve recreation sites, manage forests to reduce wildfire risk, and expand the presence of the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California in the basin.

Importantly, the modernization act would come at no new cost to taxpayers.

Strengthening the Santini-Burton Legacy

A core goal of modernization is to remain true to the original Act.

Modernization makes no changes to existing authority for the federal government to acquire land in the Tahoe Basin, maintains the permanent deed restrictions for land to be conserved for open space and public access, and clearly defines management activities allowed to take place for defensible space, forest health, water quality, and mitigating recreation impacts.

As drafted, the Santini-Burton Modernization Act will:

  • Ensure that the public land acquired remains open space for conservation and public enjoyment.
  • Maintain the existing authority of the USFS to facilitate land acquisitions in the Tahoe Basin.
  • Allow existing funds to be used for land management, prioritizing water quality, forest health, and recreation.
  • Designate the Washoe Tribe as an eligible entity to receive transfer of acquired land for environmental purposes, a designation already afforded to state and local governments.
  • Maintain the 1980 federal land sale boundaries in Clark County, Nevada.
Resources:

S.3695 – Santini-Burton Modernization Act of 2026

H.R.7255 – Santini-Burton Modernization Act of 2026

Santini-Burton Act of 1980

Santini-Burton Act of 1980 bill text

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the original Santini-Burton Act?

The original Santini-Burton Act of 1980 (S-B: P.L. 96-586) declared that the environmental quality of the Lake Tahoe Basin was being jeopardized by overdevelopment of environmentally sensitive lands. It also stated that “the unique character of the Lake Tahoe Basin is of national significance deserving of further protection and management.” The Santini-Burton Act authorized the sale of about 7,000 acres of Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands within Clark County in Southern Nevada to allow more orderly development of the communities there. Foremost, the Act required the bulk of the proceeds from the land sales in Clark County to be used for a program in which the USFS would purchase environmentally sensitive private lands around Lake Tahoe to stem degradation of the lake. The Santini-Burton Act also authorized USFS to use funds for the purposes of preventing, controlling, or mitigating water pollution associated with USFS lands in the Lake Tahoe Basin and for managing acquired lands within the Lake Tahoe Basin. Furthermore, the legislation authorized USFS to expend funds and to make payments to state and local governments for purposes related to:

  • Water pollution control and soil erosion mitigation [Section 2(g)(1)]
  • Land management purposes [Section 2(h)]
  • Acquisition by local government authorities of lands within the Lake Tahoe Basin [Section 3]

How much land in Southern Nevada is left for disposal related to the Santini-Burton Act?

The BLM has approximately 80 acres within the Santini-Burton boundary. Of those 80 acres, 65 acres are unencumbered and available to be nominated for disposal.

Has the original Santini-Burton Act been successful?

The Santini-Burton Act has shaped the preservation of Lake Tahoe’s shoreline and surrounding area for the last 45 years. Through the Act’s land acquisition authorities, USFS has acquired more than 16,000 acres of land, accounting for nearly 10 percent of the 156,000 acres of National Forest System land in the Tahoe watershed. However, changes to the Santini-Burton Act via the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act (SNPLMA) limited the use of funds generated by Santini-Burton for land acquisitions only, even though ongoing threats to the Lake Tahoe Basin require solutions beyond just land acquisition.

What is the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act?

The Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 (SNPLMA; P.L. 105-263) authorized the creation of the “SNPLMA Disposal Boundary” comprising approximately 50,000 acres of federal land in Clark County, Nevada whereby the BLM and Clark County would jointly select parcels for potential sale by competitive auction to facilitate residential and economic development needs. SNPLMA also created the “SNPLMA Special Account” into which 85 percent of the revenue generated by land sales from within the SNPLMA disposal boundary would be deposited for certain conservation projects, primarily within Clark County. The remaining revenues would be distributed to the State of Nevada’s general education fund (5 percent) and to the Southern Nevada Water Authority (10 percent) to facilitate water infrastructure needs.

How did SNPLMA change the original Santini-Burton Act?

SNPLMA further directed that if any such lands are within the SNPLMA disposal boundary that were first established by the Santini-Burton Act, the proceeds shall be used by the Secretary of Agriculture to “acquire environmentally sensitive land in the Lake Tahoe Basin pursuant to Section 3 of the Santini-Burton Act” and not other purposes authorized in Santini-Burton. The USFS’s understanding of SNPLMA is that it does not authorize the use of any SNPLMA funds for the other purposes in Santini-Burton (i.e., water pollution/soil erosion grants to localities in Section 2(g)(1) and land management by the USFS referenced in Section 2(h)) other than for land acquisition, meaning that due to SNPLMA incorporating the Santini-Burton’s Southern Nevada land sale provision under its umbrella and prioritizing those funds specifically for land acquisition in the Tahoe Basin, funds are no longer expended for other uses originally authorized by the Santini-Burton Act.

Are there other laws that support the preservation of Lake Tahoe?

Yes, the late U.S. Senators Harry Reid from Nevada and Dianne Feinstein from California led the passage of the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act in 2000 (LTRA 2000; P.L. 106-506). Dozens of partners from the public and private sectors had come together in 1997 to launch the Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) and committed to completing hundreds of restoration projects to repair damaged wetlands, thin forests, and connect Tahoe’s transportation network. Renewed by Congress in 2016, LTRA funding authorizations continue to support projects including hazardous fuels reduction, aquatic invasive species, water quality, scientific research, and water infrastructure to suppress wildfires. Congress recently extended LTRA until September 30, 2034 (P.L. 118-55), allowing the remainder of its authorized funds to be distributed through future appropriations.

What is the difference between Lake Tahoe Restoration Act (LTRA) funds and those sought by the Santini-Burton Modernization Act?

Santini-Burton management activities are the day-to-day needs of site management, such as seasonal and long-term land upkeep and maintenance of any recreation infrastructure on that land, not necessarily the large-scale, landscape-wide projects funded by the LTRA. The LTRA funds priority restoration projects, but it does not fund all needs at Tahoe. Projects not funded or underfunded by the LTRA that could receive support from the SBMA include: support for sustainable recreation and public access improvements that help reduce congestion, research, science and stewardship, water infrastructure to improve fire suppression capabilities, managing urban lot parcels in a “neighborhood fashion” as opposed to managing land as part of a larger landscape area, property line maintenance, encroachment issues, utility and right-of-way management, water conservation and consumption, and increased hazard tree removal. Regarding similar activities such as forest health, the need goes beyond what is available through the LTRA. The ability to use Santini-Burton funds in addition to LTRA will help Tahoe do more work toward protecting Tahoe’s landscape.

What makes the Santini-Burton Modernization Act distinct from existing authorities?

The Santini-Burton Modernization Act is distinct in that it authorizes funds to be used specifically for the management of acquired parcels in the Tahoe Basin and adds parity for the Washoe Tribe as a partner agency and eligible entity to receive and manage certain lands, giving the Tribe equal footing with state and local entities. The additional unique aspect of the Santini-Burton Modernization Act is that it authorizes funds to focus on public services and to enhance public access and mitigate visitor impacts, which are not funded by the LTRA or SNPLMA.

Why does the original Santini-Burton Act authorize acquisitions and transfers to state or local governments?

The Lake Tahoe Basin is split between Nevada and California, with 90 percent of the land in public ownership and 10 percent in private ownership. Public lands are a mixture of federal, state, and local government agencies. Approximately 80 percent of the basin is National Forest System lands, totaling 156,000 acres. Just because land may be unsuitable for USFS management does not mean the land does not have environmental values that USFS wants to protect for the sake of preserving the broader environmental landscape. For example, there may be a parcel surrounded by state-owned land that would be good for Santini-Burton acquisition. The most efficient management would be by the state, which is already managing adjacent parcels. This allows the USFS to meet its goals without increasing federal land ownership. In many cases, the USFS may be the agency best positioned to acquire available parcels. This all underscores the importance of the Santini-Burton Modernization Act. There are thousands of acres of USFS lands ready and authorized to be transferred to the states for future protection and public access. The Santini-Burton Modernization Act would provide the funding to complete these transfers and reduce the amount of federal land ownership in the Tahoe Basin.

History of the Santini-Burton Act

National Forest Land in the Lake Tahoe Basin National Forest System lands in the Lake Tahoe Basin encompass more than 156,000 acres and contain portions of the El Dorado and Tahoe National Forests in California and the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest in Nevada. Lake Tahoe has been the focus of federal land acquisition efforts for decades. In the late 1800s, like other resource-rich areas in the West, land claims by private companies and speculators left a checkerboard pattern of public and private land ownership across the Tahoe Basin. The perennial stewardship of the Indigenous Washoe people was replaced by logging, ranching, commercial fishing, and lakefront resorts. When the movement took hold to set aside national parks like Yosemite, Yellowstone, and the Grand Canyon, Lake Tahoe was passed over. The extent of private inholdings and environmental damage were thought to be too great.

Evolution of Public Land Acquisition in the Lake Tahoe Basin The first public lands in the Lake Tahoe Basin were established in 1899 as the Lake Tahoe Forest Reserve and totaled 37,000 acres with no lakefront property. Public acquisitions progressed slowly until the 1960s when large tracts were acquired through land exchanges. Purchases through the “Land and Water Conservation Fund” became a significant factor in the 1970s. Today, land acquisitions continue through various donations, purchases, and exchange authorities. Approximately 18 percent of the 72-mile shoreline is federally owned, and approximately 78 percent of the area around Lake Tahoe is public land managed by the USFS. In April of 1973, the portions of National Forest Lands from the Eldorado, Tahoe, and Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forests within the Tahoe Basin were consolidated into the new Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, which today manages the area with special focus on erosion control management, watershed restoration, fire management, forest management, and recreation management. The Santini-Burton Act Congress passed the Santini-Burton Act (S-B Act; P.L. 96-586), on December 23, 1980. In passing the Act, Congress declared that the environmental quality of the Lake Tahoe Basin was being jeopardized by overdevelopment of sensitive lands and that the unique character of the Lake Tahoe Basin is of national significance, deserving further protection. The passage marked a major commitment and emphasis by the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit to focus on protecting and restoring the environmental quality of Lake Tahoe. Specific provisions in the Act directed the USFS to:

  • Acquire environmentally sensitive land.
  • Restore watersheds on acquired National Forest Systems lands.
  • Administer erosion control grants to units of local government.

The Santini-Burton Act authorized the sale of about 7,000 acres of BLM lands within Clark County in Southern Nevada to allow more orderly development of the communities there. The legislation further authorized the USFS to acquire, by purchase and donation, sensitive lands in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Properties eligible for purchase under the Act are wetlands, stream environment zones, or steep and fragile lands. It took about 1.5 years to complete the planning phases, with the first acquisition recorded in October 1982. Erosion Control Grants Another provision originally included in the Santini-Burton Act authorized a sum equal to 15 percent of the acquisition dollars to be put toward erosion control grants to local governments. Allocations to the five local jurisdictions were proportionate to the acres acquired under the Act. More than $16 million has been appropriated for these grants, funding in whole or in part more than 80 water quality improvement projects. The ability to fund erosion control grants was lost with SNPLMA’s changes to Santini-Burton.

Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 (SNPLMA; P.L. 105-263) To further direct and facilitate public land disposal in the Las Vegas Valley to accommodate a growing population and accompanying economic development needs, Congress passed SNPLMA in 1998, which authorized the sale of approximately 50,000 acres of federal land within a specific area in Clark County, Nevada and created a special account into which 85 percent of the revenue generated by land sales or exchanges is deposited for the use of conservation and environmental mitigation projects, primarily in Clark County. The legislation further directed that if any such lands are within the SNPLMA disposal boundary that were first established by the Santini-Burton Act, the proceeds shall be used by the Secretary of Agriculture to “acquire environmentally sensitive land in the Lake Tahoe Basin pursuant to Section 3 of the Santini-Burton Act” and not for other purposes authorized in Santini-Burton. The USFS’s understanding of SNPLMA is that the law does not authorize the use of any SNPLMA funds for the other purposes in Santini-Burton (i.e., grants to localities in Section 2(g)(1) and land management by the USFS referenced in Section 2(h)) other than for land acquisition. SNPLMA funding is also available to be expended by the USDA Secretary for the following purposes in the Lake Tahoe Basin:

  • Development and implementation of multijurisdictional hazardous fuels reduction and wildfire prevention plans for the Lake Tahoe Basin, and
  • Environmental restoration projects in accordance with the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act.

However, federal agencies have interpreted that the use of SNPLMA funds does not encompass the purposes described in Santini-Burton, namely, water pollution control, soil erosion mitigation, and management of acquired lands. Prior to the modification of Santini-Burton by SNPLMA, the USFS acquired more than 3,500 subdivision parcels totaling 13,000 acres. Following SNPLMA becoming law in 1998, 24 parcels totaling 3,208 acres have been acquired for $77.3 million using the Santini-Burton/SNPLMA funding set-aside.

Santini-Burton Modernization Act Tahoe Partners introduced the Santini-Burton Modernization Act in 2026 in large part to restore the USFS’s ability to manage lands in the Lake Tahoe Basin, a provision of the original Act that was inadvertently removed in subsequent amendments to SNPLMA. The bill would also recognize the Washoe Tribe of California and Nevada as a partner agency and eligible entity to receive and manage certain lands, on equal footing with state and local entities.